Support and Accountability for Sex Offenders

This month, the first sex offender to participate in a Circle of Safety and Accountability (CoSA) in the South will be released from prison in Durham, North Carolina.  CoSA was founded in Hamilton, Ontario in 1994 as a response to public concern over the release of a high profile sex offender in to the community. 

The Reverend Harry Nigh is credited as the founder of CoSA in Canada

The Reverend Harry Nigh of the Mennonite Community stepped in to assist with the reintegration of this particular offender, and CoSA was born.  Since that time, CoSA programs have been established throughout the United Kingdom, and in several US states including California, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Washington.

The CoSA concept, simply put, trains volunteers to work with core members (released sex offenders) to provide the human connection necessary to create individual accountability.  Too often, sex offenders released from prison have no where to go, and no one to help them monitor their behavior outside the criminal justice system.  Research indicates that isolation and emotional loneliness are significant factors in recidivist behaviors. 

Trained CoSA volunteers meet weekly with core members, act as sounding boards for core members’ concerns, monitor their activities and behaviors, and engage with probation programs.  They assist core members with re-entry issues like housing and employment, and, unlike the criminal justice agencies that serve core members, circle volunteers are available around the clock.

A research study conducted by the Correctional Service of Canada  indicates that CoSA participants have significantly lower rates of reoffending than their non-CoSA counterparts.  The study, published in 2005, matched 60 high risk offenders involved with CoSA after their release with 60 high risk offenders who had been released but not affiliated with CoSA on risk, length of time in the community, and prior involvement in sexual offender specific treatment.  At the end of the 4.5 year follow-up, CoSA offenders had a 70% reduction in sexual recidivism as compared with non-CoSA offenders (5% vs. 16.7% respectively).  CoSA offenders also had significantly lower rates of violent recidivism and total recidivism than offenders who did not participate in the CoSA program.

In North Carolina, Nick McGeorge, head of the CoSA Steering Committee has high hopes for the program and for Durham county’s 300 convicted sex offenders.  He views the circles as early warning systems, both helping reintegration and preventing reoffending.  “The result,” he says, “is no more victims.”

Posted in Circles of Support and Accountability, Community, Criminal Justice, Re-entry | Leave a comment

2012 Colorado Restorative Justice Summit

In early August, Restorative Justice Colorado, in partnership with the Colorado Restorative Justice Council will host the 2012 Colorado Restorative Justice SummitThrough the use of Liberating Structures and Open Space approaches, the convenors hope to encourage dialogue and exchange at a different level than we find at most conference gatherings.  I applaud RJ Colorado and the Colorado Rj Council for their creativity and willingness to  push the boundaries!!  Looking forward to attending and participating!

Posted in Conference, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Drug Courts a Good Start in Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians

 

 

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Doris Downs supports Accountability Courts

Georgians will see an expansion in the availability of drug courts for people facing felony drug charges as a result of recommendations of the Governor’s Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians. To Fulton County Superior Court Judge Doris Downs, this is great news. Judge Downs has been operating acountability courts for years, and believes in the results.

The first drug court in the United States was established in Florida in 1989.  In 1994, Georgia’s first drug court opened in Macon.  Since then, a total of 35 drug courts, and 101 accountability courts in total, have been established around the state.  Still, there is room for serious expansion.  A 2010 state audit found that 4,000 of Georgia’s 60,000 state prisoners met the eligibility requirements to participate in a drug court program, but did not have access.  Governor Deal proposes to address this shortfall by increasing the budget for accountability courts five-fold to $10 million.

Proponents of drug courts such as Judeg Downs and Chief Judge Jeffrey Bagley of Forsyth County Superior Court tout the benefits of drug court over more traditional sanctions.  Drug court is less expensive than incarceration, costing about $20 per day compared to the $51 per day for a prison bed.  Whereas about 29% of state prison inmates commit another offense within two years of their release, about 7% of drug court graduates re-offend.  Further, of those who enter a drug court program, 77.6% complete the rigorous requirements and graduate.  A less concrete, but no less important benefit – drug courts help families reunite and/or stay together. 

Chuck Geter, Drug Court Graduate

The Atlanta Journal Constitution ran a five part series on drug courts in March, profiling several drug court graduates.  The consistent theme through all the stories was the re-humanization of offenders and the strengthening of their bonds to family and community.  Chuck Geter, a former Marine, Desert Storm veteran and father, says the drug court program taught him accountability.  He learned to own his actions and the resulting consequences.

 Not all of the players in Georgia’s criminal justice system are excited about the expansion of drug courts.  Some express concern about whether the resources are in place to support the expansion.  Funding and personnel are stretched to the limit in many Georgia counties, and some are skeptical about the reality of the proposed funding increases.  They have learned from experience to take a “wait and see” attitude.  Other’s are concerened about the impact running a drug court might have on the reputation of “tough on crime” judges.  In the AJC article, Floyd County Superior Court Judge Walter Matthews said he is concerned about the image of a judge as “patting people on the head and giving them trinkets or gifts because they went a week without using methamphetamine or cocaine.”  Judge Matthews wonders whether drug court might be more suited to counselors than to judges.

For Georgia’s drug offenders and the people whose lives they impact, only time and experience will tell.

Posted in Accountability Courts, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mary Fan: “A Dialogue for Healing”

Posted in Criminal Justice, Mini-Symposia, Narrative, Video | Leave a comment

“Getting Justice Reform Right.” Some Guidance for Georgia?

JoAnne Page, President and CEO of The Fortune Society, posted an editorial on The Crime Report this month that I believe offers some important guidance for criminal justice reform in Georgia.  While applauding New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie for sweeping criminal justice reforms proposed in their respective states, Page also warned about implementation issues that could cancel out the benefits of these reforms.  As The Governor’s Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians proposes legislation in support of thier recommendations, they would be wise to consider the questions that Page poses.

  1. What standards will be applied to the implementation of the proposals?
  2. What are the goals of the proposals?
  3. What are the expected outcomes?
  4. What resources will be made available for the implementation of the proposals?
  5. How will dollars saved be monitored and tracked so that they can be put back in to the rehabilitation programs that produced them?

The Georgia legislation, expected to come out this week, will focus on alternative courts, converting pre-release centers to residential substance abuse treatment centers, and funding additional parole officers.  Here’s hoping that the legislation anticipates the important questions and manages to address them.

 

Posted in Criminal Justice, Prisons, Re-entry | Leave a comment

Stephen B. Bright: “From Hatred to Understanding”

Posted in Criminal Justice, Mini-Symposia, Narrative, Video | Leave a comment

Powerpoint and Transcript from OJJDP Webinar on Restorative Justice

Dee Bell, Program Coordinator, Georgia Department of Criminal Justice

Thank you, again, to Tim Hedeen, Associate Professor of Conflict Managementin the Masters of Science in Conflict Management at Kenessaw State University, for the information presented below!!

Several weeks ago I posted some information about a Restorative Justice webinar hosted by OJJDP – Bricks and Mortar of Restorative Justice:  Build to Withstand the Winds of Change.  The webinar presenters, Gordon Bazemore, Professor of Criminology, Florida Atlantic University, and Dee Bell, Program Coordinator, Georgia Department of Criminal Justice, offered a great foundation of knowledge regarding RJ in general and its efficacy. 

Dr. Gordon Bazemore, Professor of Criminology, Florida Atlantic University

If you are interested in the specifics, the transcript of the webinar and the associated powerpoint presentation is available at OJJDP’s National Training and Technical Assistance Center.

It’s worth a few minutes to check it out.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sara Sun Beale: “Rebalancing”

Posted in Criminal Justice, Mini-Symposia, Narrative, Video | Leave a comment

“Full-On RJ” in New Zealand

Judge Fred McElrea, a semi-retired district court judge in New Zealand, wrote a wonderful article for Tikkun Magazine describing the success of restorative justice in New Zealand’s juvenile arena, and the potential he sees for the adult system.  The trick, according the Judge McElrea, is to divert criminal offenders away from the court system altogether.  New Zealand accomplished this for juvenile offenders through the Children, Young Persons and their Families Act of 1989.  Under this Act, it is assumed that juvenile offenders will go to family group conferencing sessions, and that court appearances are the exception.  There are no gatekeepers, and no restrictions regarding the types of cases that can go to family group conferencing.  In all, over 75,000 family group conferences have been conducted in New Zealand in the past ten years.  If that’s not “Full-on RJ” I don’t know what is!!

New Zealand’s success with RJ in the youth system has strongly influenced the development of restorative options for adults.  Community groups began forming in 1994, and the Ministry of Justice provided funding for pilot programs.  Restorative principles and procedures were also incorporated in to the Sentencing Act of 2002.  Still, restorative justice is not used as often or as effectively in adult cases. 

Judge McElrea shares a wonderful perspective on why adults may not be willing to take RJ “full-on.”  He says, “The situation with young people is slightly different in that young offenders – in my experience – are generally prepared to be held accountable and nearly always admit their offending; hearings where liability is denied are very much the exception.  This willingness to “own up” is perhaps more common in a family setting (including a family group conference), and may not carry through to an adult setting dominated by an adversarial culture and legal advice that the defendant can (or should) “put the prosecution to the proof.”" 

I wonder whether this adversarial culture will change in 10-15 years when the youth of New Zealand who have been immersed in RJ become the adults who must decide whether to “own up?”

Posted in Adult, Culture, Juvenile Justice, Youth | Leave a comment

“Somebody Could Have Died That Day” – Restorative Practices in Schools

As I was catching up on my email today, trying to get organized for the new year, I came across an email from Restorative Justice Online.  The email was an update of the most interesting, often read, or most commented on posts on the Restorative Justice Online Blog during the month of December. 

The first story on the list, “Somebody Could Have Died That Day,” brought a lump to my throat and tears to my eyes.  It’s a brief, powerful account of the use of a restorative circle by a ninth grade student in a Detroit high school.  I hope you’ll take a minute to read it and that it will affect you in the same positive way it did me.

Posted in Blogs, Schools, Youth | Leave a comment